If your political campaign is still running mass texts to drive donations, you’re not alone. In recent election cycles, both parties have embraced high-frequency, one-size-fits-all fundraising texts that flood voter inboxes.
That strategy previously may have been effective. But campaigns are seeing lower and lower returns with higher and higher opt-out rates. And your supporters are getting frustrated and annoyed, even when they want to hear from you. Does texting from campaigns have to be this way?
Here at Community, we don’t think so.
What started as a promising new channel for political engagement has, in many cases, turned into unwanted spam. The issue isn’t texting itself. It’s how it’s done.
Campaigns on both sides of the aisle often default to a cookie-cutter texting strategy: spray the same generic messages to every list they can as often as they can and hope it generates results. This might feel efficient at first, but it's a short-term play with long-term pitfalls.
Here’s why that approach backfires:
Poor texting practices aren’t just annoying. They hurt your reputation. If your message feels like a faceless blast, your supporters will treat it like one. And for a political campaign, losing the attention and loyalty of your supporters results in lost donations, lost volunteers, and even lost votes.
Texting isn’t the bad guy. When done right, it’s one of the most powerful channels for engagement. The key is moving from mass blasting to meaningful messaging.
That means:
According to Twilio Segment, 80% of campaigns see on average 38% higher consumer spend when using personalization. Yet, Gartner reports that 63% of digital marketers struggle with providing their audiences with personalized experiences. It’s time to bridge that gap.
We’ve seen leaders using Community lean into a smarter, more respectful model. Instead of blasting out the same message to thousands, they use audience insights to craft tailored campaigns. From disclosed or zero-party data capture, to segmentation via subcommunities, to automated workflows, they use smart tools to help ensure that messages feel timely, personal, and relevant, even at scale.
These leaders follow-up based on specific actions, like those who clicked or didn’t click a campaign, those who responded or didn’t respond, those who opted in by texting a certain keyword or tapping a certain link.
In other words: less shouting, more connecting.
Whether you’re rallying voters, mobilizing volunteers, raising funds, or promoting a cause, the goal is the same: get your audience to take action. But you can’t shortcut trust. And when you treat every supporter the same, you risk losing them altogether.
It’s time to rethink political texting.
Ready to see what’s possible? Demo the Community experience and let’s drive change together. Learn more about political texting done right in this blog post.